Report on the Council Budget Request
Tom Bacon
Bacon recalled for the Council that the last time the Council
met (May 3rd), the council was requesting funding from the
General Assembly as part of the AHEC budget. The three-year
grant from The Duke Endowment to support the Council ended
April 30. The Council did not receive funding from the 2005
General Assembly. Bacon spoke with Mary Piepenbring, Director
of the Health Care Division of the Duke Endowment whether
the Duke Endowment would consider a continuation grant for
two more years Mary Piepenbring recommended that the Council
should submit a request with 50% matching funds. In actuality,
the Council has a substantial match thanks to the support
of a few of its partner institutions, namely: East Carolina
University, Western Carolina University, UNC-Chapel Hill,
Health Care Facilities Association, NC Hospital Association,
and the North Carolina AHEC program.
The grant to Duke Endowment was submitted by the August15
deadline. The Duke Endowment advisory committee will not review
it until November. Assuming it is approved, funding will start
January 1st 2006.
Bacon said that the likely funding schedule left us with
a six month hiatus in necessary funding. He said
that AHEC has committed funds through September 30th, but
that we are still working out a means of funding the Council
through December 31st in order to avoid an interruption in
Council services.
Bacon commented that he was optimistic that the Duke Endowment
grant would be funded. He explained that the Councils
request to the General Assembly was substantially larger than
the prospective Duke Endowment funding because the Council
had other plans of what could be done with additional staff,
the funding of additional workforce studies, and other work
such as recruiting young people into allied health careers.
Projects such as these will have to be put on hold until we
can identify more funding sources.
Bacon stated that despite this, the Duke Endowment support
would allow the Council to continue at a substantial level
of activity with its current staffing compliment.
Looking to the future, Bacon said that getting funding out
of the next years short session of the General
Assembly would be a challenge. State budgets are reviewed
on a biennium basis. The next real shot at funding, therefore,
would be in the spring of 2007.
Even though it would be challenging to acquire funding in
the short session, efforts will be made by the Council to
do so.
If the Duke Endowment grant is funded, it would keep the
Council going until December 2007 and would overlap with the
Councils prospective request for funding from the General
Assembly in the spring of 2007.
Reaffirming Bacons comments, David Yoder said that
the Council would certainly go back to the NC General Assembly
in the short session and make an effort to acquire
funding.
Bacon said that any monetary support that a partner institution
could provide in to keep the Council funded in the final three
months of 2005 would be helpful and greatly appreciated.
Bacon then asked for comments/questions concerning Council
budgetary matters.
Alan Brown pointed out that the budget that we had now was
limited and that more had been allocated for workforce studies
in previous years.
Bacon agreed, saying that we had over $50,000 a year in the
past for studies that produced workforce reports and that
we would have to cut back on that substantially now. He said
that the UNC Presidents office had made some commitments
to support some additional studies but that direct dollar
funding was limited.
Yoder pointed out that there was no representative from the
Sheps Center at the September meeting. This is because Erin
Fraher, who had been representing the Center, has gone back
to graduate school full time. This means that there is presently
no allied health workforce person employed at the Sheps Center,
Yoder stated.
Bacon commented that this did not mean that the Council would
do nothing on workforce issues; it just means that the Council
does not have a dedicated staff person committed to workforce
studies.
Kathy Heilig asked if there was an estimated amount of money
that will cover the last quarter of expenses. Yoder responded
that $30,000 was a good estimate.
Election of New Officers 05-07: Report from the Nomination
Committee
Rees Jenkins
Rees Jenkins, chair of the Nomination Committee for New Council
Officers, said that he had three candidates who were highly
qualified for Council leadership, and that he was pleased
to recommend them to the Council. The first was Kathy Heilig
for Chair. Jenkins said that she was an employer representative
on the Council and that she was currently serving as Vice-Chair.
The second was Karen Luken for Vice-Chair, who is a professional
representative on the Council and currently serves as treasurer.
Finally, Jenkins recommended Alan Brown as the new treasurer.
Bacon called for any further nominations for these offices
from the Council, but there were none.
The motion to vote for the election of the recommended persons
was made and seconded.
They were all elected by voice vote.
The election results in summary are that:
- Kathy Heilig is the new Council Chair
- Karen Luken is the new Council Vice-Chair
- Alan Brown is the new Council Treasurer
Bacon noted that the election of new officers moves Rees
Jenkins off the Executive Committee as the immediate past
chair.
A certificate was presented to Rees Jenkins for 14
years of distinguished contribution to the Council in the
roles of representative of the NCHCFA, Vice Chair, Chair and
Immediate Past Chair.
Bacon commented that Jenkins was in a leadership role of
the Council at a pivotal time; and that during his years of
service the Council went from being a loosely associated,
voluntary group to becoming a more established entity that
has sought larger funding and has hired staff for the Council.
He urged Rees to continue to attend and participate in Council
activities even though he doesnt have an official title.